Combat Focus: Panzer III vs M3 Grant

This week, we’re comparing two of the campaign’s great medium tanks – the Panzer III and M3 Grant. We’ll dive into the history, then see how they measure up in Bolt Action!

Vital Statistics


	Panzer III Ausf. J	M3 Grant I
Cost:	160pts (Inexperienced), 200pts (Regular), 240pts (Veteran)	168pts (Inexperienced), 210pts (Regular)
Weapons:	1 turret-mounted medium anti-tank gun with co-axial MMG and 1 forward-facing hull-mounted MMG.	1 hull-mounted medium anti-tank gun covering the front and right arcs, 1 turret-mounted light anti-tank gun with co-axial MMG
Damage value:	9+ (Medium Tank)	9+ (Medium Tank)
Options:		May add a cupola (turret) mounted MMG for +10pts (making it a Lee I)
Special Rules:	Reinforced rear armour: The Ausf H and J treats hits against the rear armour as hits against the side armour. (i.e. +1 penetration modifier rather than +2)	HE: Instead of causing D2 HE hits, a HE shell causes D6 hits (75mm gun tanks)
		Easily catches fire: If a roll on the vehicle damage table results in the vehicle catching fire, add D3 pin markers rather than just 1 before taking the morale test.
		Vulnerable: Because of the riveted construction, all shots to the side and rear of the vehicle get an additional +1 penetration modifier (ie. in total, +2 for side hits and +3 for rear hits)

On the Tabletop

The Panzer III is a classic medium tank – perfectly designed to take out enemy tanks without breaking a sweat.

When it comes to Bolt Action, these tanks represent two different philosophies or play-styles.

The Panzer III is a classic medium tank – perfectly designed to take out enemy tanks without breaking a sweat. The combination of medium anti-tank gun and exceptional armour all-around gives you the confidence to utilise the vehicle’s mobility and hunt down enemy tanks practically unsupported.

When facing down an M3 Grant, your best bet is to attack from outside the 75mm gun’s limited arc (from the left flank). Your 9+ armour will easily shrug off shots from the turret-mounted light anti-tank gun, and the Vulnerable special rule means you’ll have an easy time putting shots through the side armour.

Tank crews receiving instruction on the new M3 Grant tank. This photo shows one of the camouflage patterns used by the British in the desert.

The M3 Grant requires a more integrated approach. It can’t dash off down the table to hunt down enemy armour unsupported. As a jack of all trades, master of none, it is reasonably well-employed pinning down enemy infantry with HE shells or picking off light vehicles with the turret-mounted gun.

Its array of medium machine guns gives it an extra edge at close range, allowing it to suppress enemy positions while an infantry attack goes in.

Against a Panzer III, use the terrain to your advantage – block line of sight to your vulnerable left flank and force the enemy tank into the fire arc of your medium gun.

On the Battlefield

The main advantage of the Grant was that it gave the Commonwealth parity with Axis armoured units.

In Bolt Action, it seems like the obvious choice is the Panzer III. It’s cheaper, with better performance against other tanks, with a slight disadvantage against enemy infantry (something that the rest of an Afrika Korps army is more than capable of addressing.)

Things are not quite as simple off the tabletop. The main advantage of the Grant was that it gave the Commonwealth parity with Axis armoured units. Previously, British tanks had been under-armoured or under-gunned when compared to the Panzer IIIs and IVs in service with German units.

A Panzer III H somewhere in North Africa.

The Grant’s 75mm gun completely changed the playing field – now British gunners were able to engage German tanks and anti-tank guns well beyond their effective range, and had access to HE rounds, something previously denied to them.

The FlaK 88 anti-aircraft gun was still a huge threat, particularly given the Grant’s high profile, but generally speaking the Grant was a much-needed upgrade to British armoured formations.